Poor Basil Marceaux: Most Awesomely Inarticulate Political Candidate Ever
He is a special little snowflake. If he wins governor, please be careful with all of those guns. ;-)
He is a special little snowflake. If he wins governor, please be careful with all of those guns. ;-)
Wow, this is a tough one. McChrystal is unhappy. Now the Big O is unhappy because of the forthcoming Rolling Stone article detailing blunt talk from the Afghan Campaign war leader. If the Big O sacks McChrystal and we lose the war in Afghanistan, it will be completely on Obama. This is a tough situation. If he doesn't sack McChrystal, why in-the-hell did he bring him from around the world for an ass-chewing? Wouldn't his efforts be better served in the war zone and not caught up in political theater or dancing at the whim of Obama? If leadership doesn't get its act together, there are gonna be horrific consequences.
Update: Here's a link to the Rolling Stone article. McChristal is gone. Can't wait for his book to come out. ;-)
This is a pretty cool political ad. I don't know anything about this guy, but he rocks. I think he has dropped out of his race, but he made another video endorsing someone. It is pretty awesome too.
The country asks for leadership and we get bravado and vulgarity. I wonder how long it took him to get his lines memorized for the interview and which writer thought it would be a good idea to throw that line out for a sound bite? Jeez.
This politician gets it. Awesome. :-)
Update (7/11/2010): It would seem Gov. Christie is kicking ass. Good for him.

"A hate free zone," right next to "hope she chokes." Pot, meet kettle. Funny.
via Patterico.com.
I have no hope for our future as a nation. Seriously.
I have a lot of things to say about this video, but I will let it jell for a while and see what forms. More later.
I have finally come to a conclusion to the healthcare debate. If you were my wife, you would know that I take a long time thinking about stuff. It took me almost two years to come to a conclusion about gay marriage. Also, if you were my wife--you'd be married to me. :-P There are really only two sides to this healthcare thing: either full support of government run healthcare or privatized healthcare as we have it now. Yeah, there are a lot of things that can be changed and regulated, but it still comes out to two sides, more or less. People are all over the place on this issue because of fear and avoidance of reality. Here are my thoughts in some kind of logical order--at least logical in my mind.
Now
Right now we have a privatized healthcare system that has government oversight and regulation that sits side-by-side with three government medical initiatives--for lack of a better term in my limited vocabulary: Medicare, Medicaid, and the Veteran's Health Administration. This is oversimplification, but just go along with it. All of these entities (private and government) work at varying levels of success and failure depending on the multitude of situations. Drugs, procedures, tools, and general advancement happen because of investment of time and money. Someone is paying somewhere and expects a return on investment. It is a market-based economy and a return on investment sounds fair given the climate.
Socialized Medicine
There are a number of folks who think that the government should provide healthcare for "all." All is in quotes because there are different folks that think the definition of all should or shouldn't include a number of paying/un-paying/citizen/non-citizen members. I won't even try to get into that morass of a clusterf*ck, but these folks think that we are a wealthy nation and that people should have adequate healthcare that all of us should be contributing to with tax dollars. Break your arm; go to the hospital and get it photographed, fixed, and casted for no cost. Sounds pretty good. No insurance hassles, no mess, no fuss.
Privatized Healthcare
Most people can agree that the system now is not a great one. The people in a good spot in life have decent care and there are headaches in the system, but they are not totally unacceptable. I would further argue that most folks would like the costs a little lower and a bit more oversight regarding some shady business practices of insurers. The major caveat is that people who have some kind of care, private and/or Medicare, do not want their existing services compromised by the addition of socialized government-run healthcare. Can the people on the socialized medicine side see that people who have decent coverage do not want their coverage f*cked up?
The Problem with Socialized Medicine
I see a number of problems with socialized medicine. The biggest problems are how to pay for it and who gets it? Yeah, folks love to use the post office analogy regarding socialized medicine, but the reality is that the post office loses money every year and we keep sinking money into it. Healthcare will have a much bigger price tag and there is no getting around that fact. As for who gets it? The people that make up the citizenry of the United States should get it, in my humble opinion; but we both know that won't fly. Right now, non-citizens are getting free education and instruction in public schools on the taxpayer dime. When Joe Wilson heckled "You lie!" at President Obama when he said illegals wouldn't get free healthcare, Joe wasn't entirely wrong. Just a little while later, Obama said he would like a path toward amnesty for illegals in place in the near future. So these same illegals today would have free healthcare in the near future if we had socialized medicine right now. So Obama was telling a tiny lie, but we know his heart is in the right place--so we won't penalize him on that one. There are many many more problems, but these two are the ones I hear people screaming about the most.
The Problem with What We have Now
The biggest problems we have with the existing system are predatory practices of insurance companies, trial lawyers that get huge awards in malpractice courts, and the cost of insurance and its impact on business. I will break these three things down and try to relay my thoughts about these problems. Insurance companies are for-profit entities. They are out to turn a profit and are regulated by state governments. They also try to find ways of not providing dollars for healthcare. They do this because some of their clients lie, cheat, and steal. Is it their job to tell the difference between someone who is lying and someone who made a mistake on a form--in a perfect world yes, but we know they really can't discern the difference. Trial lawyers are sharks. They get huge settlements for some clients who are clearly milking the system. I sat in on a clear case of someone who was trying to milk the system. The plaintiff was the stereotypical injured person who needed a cane during the trial, but didn't need it after court. She was looking for millions, but was awarded $2,000 by the jury. She was angered beyond belief when the verdict was read. As for the impact on business, I read a great article (that I can't find any longer) about how money spent on employee healthcare could be used by companies for re-investment if socialized medicine were commonplace in the United States. In my mind, that article was the best argument I have read to date for socialized medicine.
My Opinion
I would totally be for universal healthcare in the United States if the government did a few things. These things would be painful, but ultimately would lead to a fairer system.